Money has now become secondary to initial interest.
We as humans are tribal folk. It’s a defence mechanism built into our DNA that says “Safety in numbers” when with your own kind.
Previously in more smelly and furry times it was essential to not being eaten but in the modern world the chances of that happening are pretty slim and so we look to our emotional defence instead.
An exploration of why how music is presented is just as important as the music itself
As I round off my trilogy (maybe) of Metallica album reviews we now take a look at probably the most discussed album outside of Master Of Puppets, although for different reasons.
The follow up to Metallica’s seminal 1991 self titled album has been both controversial and surprising to many of the band’s fans, but what was it about this album which was just so damn divisive?
In 1991 the heavy metal band Metallica released their 5th studio album simply self titled “Metallica”.
In the years to follow the release, which has affectionately become known as “The Black album” (Way before the 2003 Jay-Z album started using that name) was the the most insanely popular rock/metal album of the last century but what gave it it’s appeal and how well does it stack up today?
I have been, let’s say rather vocal about Metallica’s output over the last 15 years. In other words I think it has been extremely sub-par in almost all areas for a band at their level so is this new offering going to change anything?
Being a soundy, recordy type person (technical term) part of my job is to master songs in order to tweak and bring some sheen to the mix.
Sometimes it can go too far, and it’s become a trend!